The Illusion of Identity

In this journey I’ve embarked upon to trace my root lineage, family background, and nationality, I would like to outline my observations and takeaways so far. This will serve as a significant chapter, and in a way, a chance to get things off my chest.

First off, I should mention that what I am about to say might strike certain groups struggling with identity issues as trivial or laughable. I was born within the borders of the Republic of Turkey, and the identity instilled in me was that of being a Turk and a citizen of Turkey. I would rather not use the word "instilled"—or indoctrinated—because in some civilizations outside Turkey, indoctrination seems to be manufactured through top-down, painful means. The identity imparted to us in Turkey revolved around the events that unfolded during and just prior to the founding of the young Turkish Republic in the 1920s, the struggles endured by the nation, and how we could adopt a realistic outlook against the rest of the world under a shared denominator of citizenship. In short, the general populace of modern Turkey didn't traditionally harbor an obsession over bloodline or genetic purity. Yet, as evidenced by the founding father's words referring to "the noble blood in your veins," I later realized that a quest for blood, lineage, and belonging had always existed among certain local/indigenous groups as well as some immigrant communities. It turns out there were all sorts of anxieties surrounding us that we were entirely unaware of. We were simply being raised to become useful individuals for our homeland and nation.

I suppose this perspective would translate into a bitter, ironic smile on the faces of people living in Russia—those who know all too well what assimilation is, how it is executed, and what it feels like to be subjected to it.

Confronting data in genetic genealogy can shock people. Data feels soulless and static. It is usually tagged with ethnos labels that geneticists and archaeologists may or may not have named accurately, and it falls short of telling the story of hidden or forgotten family histories and migration routes like mine. It simply sits in front of you like a slip containing broad generalizations, showing where your current blood and flesh are most concentrated.

Of course, the consciousness of "Turkishness"—ingrained in me not just through the state, but through family narratives—also helped me grasp the past and present state of this world. For instance, I came to realize how difficult it is to be a Turk in the Caucasus. Throughout history, Turks—alternately branded as barbarians, predators, or state-builders—truly "lost" on the Russian front. This wasn't an ordinary loss; the Ottoman northern front was utterly devastated. I pieced this together through my DNA results, when expected matches failed to appear, and through my habit of researching history and reading academic theses. For example, anyone looking at Russia from the outside who fails to see anti-Turk sentiment is truly blind. I imagine that just like in the Caucasus, being a Turk in Russia is exceptionally difficult. Anti-Islam sentiment follows right behind it. But particularly in the Caucasus, even Islam cannot save the Turks. If you are a Turk, saying La ilaha illallah is not enough; you are also expected to accept that you are not a Turk, and that there were never any Turks in the history of the Caucasus at any point in time.

If you claim otherwise, they come at you with DNA, biased Soviet history, or if those fail, Gulags and the KGB. If you prove it via DNA, they come at you with haplogroups. For example, they say, "The first state named 'Turk' was established in 500 AD, but this haplogroup took shape in 500 BC, so you cannot be a Turk."

My dear friends, this is a farce. As if Russia or Georgia invented their language, religion, and culture the exact moment they were founded—like in a Civilization game where, once a state is established, a language is invented on day one, taught to the masses, culture is created, and coded into the people...

In truth, the identity struggles in the Caucasus, in Russia, in Israel, or anywhere else in the world... They merely reveal how lonely and powerless human beings are on this globe amidst these unknowns. No, I have never been a part of this game. Pity on some Greeks, Armenians, Georgians, Kurds, Adyghes, and the rest of you. Pity on you for constructing your fragile, magical lives on this earth around an illusion of belonging and identity anchored purely to flesh and bone.

Is it truly so hard to grasp that all we really need is to realize we have no flaws, and nothing is wrong with us at all?
I pity those who claim "my culture is more noble" or "we are not inferior."

In reality, they are merely screaming how deeply insecure they truly are.

Searching for Roots: Intellectual Curiosity or Narcissistic Tribalism?

In today's world, where genealogy and genetic testing have become increasingly widespread, many of us set out on a journey to trace the footprints of the past, understand our ancestors' migration routes, and uncover our own historical coordinates. However, two different individuals embarking on this journey with the exact same dataset can arrive at entirely opposite mental destinations by the end of the road: while one reaches a state of universal liberation, the other retreats into the refuge of narrow tribalism.

So, where does that fine line between the pursuit of truth and narcissistic shelter actually lie?

Frankly, I never needed to answer this difficult question myself. Both my maternal and paternal sides already knew they were "defeated peoples" who had fled from somewhere, a story passed down directly by our grandfathers. Therefore, narcissism was never even on the table for me. Yet, on social media platforms and forums where I logged in to inquire about family lore regarding my ancestral roots outside Turkey, my identity and narrative of belonging were so fiercely rejected by groups that had swallowed the anti-Turk sentiment fostered under Russian rule, I might as well say it made me want to become a Turk.

I had to be a Turk, because Turks were truly the ones who were oppressed and continue to be oppressed.

Purpose: To Understand, or to Inflate Oneself?

For a mind driven by intellectual curiosity, genealogical research is a detective process. Its objective is to grasp the dynamics of geography, history, and human mobility. Even if the retrieved data feels static or unexpected, such a mind accepts it as it is and frames it within its proper historical context.

In narcissistic tribalism, however, the objective is not understanding, but masking individual shortcomings with collective pride. Such a person looks at the past through a magnifying glass; they gather only the pieces that stroke their ego and validate the myth that "we are the most noble," while completely disregarding the rest. This condition is at an all-time high in the Caucasus.

The Ultimate Outcome: Liberation, or Acquiring an Armor?

The most distinct difference between these two approaches lies in the emotion felt at the end of the journey.

The tribalist mind that turns the past into armor clings to tribalism even tighter at the end of its investigation. While shouting the superiority of its own culture or bloodline, it merely broadcasts a deeply rooted sense of inadequacy.

In contrast, an individual who traces their roots with intellectual courage arrives at a simple truth at the end of their search: belongings built around flesh and bone are nothing more than an illusion. As they decipher the artificial boundaries of history and genetics, they come to realize humanity's existential loneliness and simplicity on this globe.

Curiosity about our ancestors' past and asking where we come from is a deeply human and valuable impulse. However, the crucial point is not to replace our self-worth with the past, but to recognize how hollow that armor truly is and shed it altogether.

For a free individual who generates their own worth, the past is not a fortress to take shelter in; it is merely a small, humble footnote on the shared stage of human history.

​A Manifesto of Values: Beyond Blood and Titles

​1. Nobility is Not a Bloodline; It is a Conduct:

True nobility is defined by one's actions, not by genetic inheritance. A noble spirit is honest, peaceful, and committed to meritocracy rather than the status quo. They are the guardians of the weak and the few against the powerful and the many. A noble mind does not lazily hide behind the memory of a kingly ancestor; it draws power from the moral codes inherited from those who taught them how to be strong. If you are weak today, your ancestors were never truly strong. Intelligence, logic, and a life free of contradictions are the only true marks of an elite mind.

​2. The Pursuit of Truth Over Titles:

The research presented on this blog is not a search for princes or kings. I am a seeker of Truth. Every ancestor prepares the path for their descendant through their own life. An ancestor’s action does not end; the descendant continues that action from where it was left. Therefore, a descendant searches through their ancestor’s past only to question and find the meaning of their own current actions. It is not a search to find a crown upon an ancestor’s head, but to find the purpose of one’s own existence.

​3. The Delusion of Purity:

The fetishization of "pure blood" is a psychological frailty. In an age ruled by intellect, information, and creativity, those who desperately cling to the idea of being an "inbred, untainted race" are weak and destined to vanish. They are the unfortunate victims of their own insecurity. I truly find it far more noble if my ancestors chose to merge with other cultures for the sake of freedom and survival. Mixing is an act of resilience; isolation is a sign of decay.

​4. Universal Brotherhood in a Lidless Universe:

I hold the history of every nation and every family in the same high regard as my own. In this lidless universe, every story is unique, every person is equally lost, and in that lostness, we are all siblings. We are all children of the cosmos.

​5. The Noble Soul Does Not Deny the Power of Love:

The Sky Father (Tengri) created all human beings in the same form with similar capabilities. Those who open their hearts to this inclusivity realize that there is little difference between "white" and "black." More than 99% of our DNA is identical. In genealogy, we focus on differences only to understand our own uniqueness—not to practice discrimination or to forget the whole.

​6. An Ancestral Signature:

I write these values in accordance with the principles of my own ancestors. I know that if they were alive today, they would sign their names under this manifesto without hesitation.

​Why This Manifesto?

​Recently, I encountered an individual—a self-proclaimed "Avar Princess"—who claimed that South Ossetians could not be considered descendants of the Alans because they are "genetically mixed" like Georgians. Upon further inspection, I found a profound contradiction: while she presents herself as a "pure" Avar princess based on her mtDNA, she herself is of mixed Crimean Tatar and Caucasian Avar descent.

​Furthermore, how can one be so certain about the definition of "purity"? Perhaps those who moved south and "mixed" did so to resist Northern or Russian assimilation, choosing survival and cultural continuity over a stagnant, forced identity. What if the "true" Alans are exactly those who integrated into the diverse fabric of the South to keep their essence alive?

​My ancestors moved South, to where it was brighter and sunnier. Scientific data (FTDNA) clearly shows the connection: an Iron Age Caucasian lineage followed by an ancient Alan connection (R-FTE87447). They moved South because they followed the sun—their Tengri. They shared their wealth with the poor and lived in peace with everyone. They banished conflict and hatred as soon as they began, replacing them with unity. In this way, love flourished within them, and their hearts did not grow cold; on the contrary, they warmed.

​Those who do not feel this love cannot speak its language; their tongues only return to the frozen language of discrimination, as emphasized in the 5th article of this manifesto. It is baffling to witness someone who is genetically diverse themselves use "mixing" as a disqualifier for others. We do not look back to find crowns; we look back to find the moral compass that guides us in a chaotic world.

The Sovereign Mirror: Genetic Archeology as a Rite of Ancestral Healing

The Uncomfortable Archive Identity is often treated as a polished museum exhibit—curated, static, and safe. However, for those of us who venture into the realm of Y-DNA research, the discovery of a lineage acts as a cold, indifferent archive. It is not an exercise in vanity. It is a necessary confrontation with the "Frontier"—a territory where merit, function, and survival dictated one’s name far more than any modern ethnic label.

I. Functional Meritocracy: The Indispensable Architects

History is not built by those who simply "belong," but by those who are indispensable. Consider William the Conqueror; a descendant of Viking raiders who did not "convert" to being French, but instead forged the administrative and military backbone of England. He was a man of the frontier who redefined the center. Or look at Saladin, a Kurd whose identity was forged in the fire of his defense of the Levant, or the Mamluks of Egypt, Caucasian and Kipchak warriors who saved the heart of the Middle East from the Mongol onslaught.

Their identity was not a static birthright, but a dynamic, functional "Service." It is within this historical frequency—perhaps somewhere in the periphery of the Sluzhilyye class—that the echoes of my own ancestors seem to resonate. Not as holders of fixed titles, but as those who maintained the balance of the Borderlands through their presence and their specialized ethos.

II. The Nakh Horizon and the Ballistics of Time

At the core of this investigation lies the Nakh people—the ancient ancestors of the Vainakh, Chechen, and Ingush. They represent one of the most resilient genetic strata of the Caucasus, a "Knightly" culture of the highlands that has endured for millennia. My specific focus is the J-Y3612 phylogenetic tree.

To understand Y-DNA research, one must think of it as a long-range sniper shot. Between 100 and 500 meters (the last 100-500 years), the trajectory is direct; there is almost no deviation. But as the range extends to 1 kilometer (1,000 years) or 2 kilometers (2,000 years), the bullet begins to rotate and drift. By the time we reach 3,000 years, the mark remains, but the "circular error" is vast.

My current matches reside in this 3,000-year drift. In the J-Y3612 spectrum, we see a kaleidoscope of Caucasian and Eurasian lineages. As the research moves toward the more advanced clades, the lens narrows, becoming more specific, yet even within these refined branches, a wide range of possibilities remains. The "hardware" is programmed for the Nakh highlands, even if the "software" has been running a different cultural code for centuries.

III. Healing the Orphaned Lineage: Service to the Ancestor Cult

I share these insights not as a finished history, but as a general illumination for others conducting their own lonely investigations. My own lineage remains shrouded in shadow. The trail goes cold with my great-great-grandfather—a child left orphaned, carrying a past that was perhaps forcibly forgotten or silenced by the brutal tides of 19th-century displacement.

This quest is my service to the Ancestor Cult. Finding the truth behind these advanced clades is an act of karmic healing. It is about returning the "Name" to the one who was stripped of it. It is about reconnecting a severed thread that has left my family "orphaned" in the historical record. I seek this truth not for pride, but to finally allow the spirit of that orphaned ancestor to find peace in the light of the truth.

Conclusion: A Beacon in the Dark

My own soy (lineage) is still being deconstructed, piece by piece. I am a seeker in the dark. Genetic research is the ultimate act of Benliksizlik (Selflessness), for it requires us to kill our "imagined" selves to meet our "actual" ancestors. We owe it to those who carried this blood through the fire to at least remember its name. We are not returning to a home on a map; we are returning to the home that exists in our marrow.

The Genetic Cipher of "Kara": Tracing the J-FT6314 Lineage from the Arsk Princes to the Southern Caucasus

(A Scientific Analysis with a Dash of Genealogical Irony)

Abstract: The search for ancestral origins often encounters the "Common Surname Obstacle." In Turkic populations, the name "Kara" is so ubiquitous that trying to trace it is like looking for a specific grain of sand in the Sahara. However, by synthesizing Y-DNA genomic data (J-FT6314) and oral traditions ("Karalar / Kara Ahmetler"), we find a compelling—if not slightly dramatic—link between the Southern Caucasus and the medieval Tatar nobility of the Volga-Ural region.

I. The "Kara" Paradox and the Arsk Princes

While "Kara" often simply denotes "Black" or "Great," in my specific case, it serves as the key to a medieval rabbit hole. According to historical annals, a semi-legendary figure named Kara-bek sired a line of service Tatars who were so insistent on their status that every single descendant claimed the title of Prince (Knyaz) rather than the more modest Murza. It seems my ancestors didn't just want to be part of the elite; they wanted the full "royal" package—a sentiment my DNA seems to remember even if my bank account doesn't.

II. The "Kypchak in Georgia" Comedy

In the Southern Caucasus, specifically in Georgia, "Kypchak heritage" is the go-to story for anyone who looks a bit too "Northern" or acts a bit too "rebellious." It has become a charmingly overused historical trope, much like claiming to be a descendant of a long-lost European count. While the tales of my ancestors being "heroic Kypchak warriors" in the Georgian mountains have often bordered on the comical—sounding more like a folk ballad than a census report—the J-FT6314 data adds an unexpected layer of "wait, this might actually be true" to the comedy. It turns out, we weren't just making up stories to sound cool at mountain feasts; we were likely just a very lost, very stubborn branch of the Volga Tatar nobility who took a wrong turn at the Elbrus.

III. Phylogenetic Evidence: The J-FT6314 Cluster and the "Advanced Test" Gap

The convergence of historical text and genomic data is most evident in the analysis of the J2a-M67 sub-clades. My investigation focuses on a specific cluster within the Y3612 branch:

• The Four Musketeers of Y3612: According to the data, there are four distinct families identified under the Y3612 parent branch.

• The Advanced Test Precision: Currently, only one of these families has undergone advanced (Big Y/NGS) testing, which successfully placed them into my specific sub-clade, J-FT6314, residing in Srednyaya Yelyuzan (Penza Region).

• The Potential: While the other three families remain at the broader Y3612 level due to a lack of advanced testing, the geographical and historical proximity suggests they are highly likely to be part of the same FT6314 lineage. This "missing link" in testing is the only thing standing between a single match and a full-blown family reunion in Tatarstan.

The phonetic resemblance between "Gorodishchensky" (the district of our FT6314 match) and my family's oral label "KoroAhmet" is almost too convenient—one might say it’s the universe’s way of rewarding a very persistent detective with a sense of humor.

---

Researcher’s Notes & Disclaimers

• A "Semi-Serious" Obsession: To be clear, I view this entire investigation as an intensely entertaining, semi-serious hobby. It is my way of playing "History Detective" without the bureaucracy of a tenure-track academic position.

• The "Onomastic Trap": I am fully aware that chasing ancestors based solely on name similarities is the fastest way to get lost in a genealogical swamp. "Kara" is everywhere, and names change faster than borders in the Caucasus. I am not claiming an Arsk Princedom—though if someone offers me a throne, I have the DNA results ready.

• The Data Gap: I acknowledge that until the remaining families under the Y3612 branch undergo advanced testing, my conclusions remain a "highly probable hypothesis."

• Jungian Synchronicity: I choose to believe in Jung’s theory of meaningful coincidences. If Google leads me to a Russian PDF that links my exact Y-DNA to a "Prince Kara-Bek," I’m going to enjoy the ride. It’s 50% science, 50% cosmic comedy, and 100% passion.

---

Reference Library & Primary Sources

For those interested in diving into the technical depths of this research, here are the primary sources and historical datasets utilized:

• [REPORT] Genomic Analysis of Tatar Noble Lineages and J-FT6314 Sub-clades – Comprehensive research paper detailing the phylogenetic distribution of Y-DNA branches in the Volga-Ural region.

• [WIKI] The Arsk (Karinsk) Princes: History and Genealogy – Historical overview of the Kara-Bek lineage and the social status of service Tatars.

The Ghost Match: How mtDNA Revealed the Geography of a Y-DNA Mystery

The Ghost Match: Decoding YF089142 and the Matriarchal Key

In late 2022, I uploaded my Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data to YFull, hoping to break through the brick wall of my paternal lineage. I was fortunate. My sample (YF123875) was placed into a specific subclade, J-Y284818, thanks to a single "hidden sample" already present in the tree.

This hidden match, identified only as YF089142, was the key. Because we shared specific SNPs, we formed a new branch formed approximately 3900 years ago (TMRCA 3900 ybp).

However, a mystery remained. As the "YF" prefix suggests, this sample was uploaded long before mine (likely from Nebula Genomics data), but the user had not specified a nationality. Despite my attempts to contact them, I received no response. I had a genetic cousin who defined my branch, but I had no idea who they were or where they came from.

Later, when I uploaded my father's FTDNA results, we were further refined into the terminal branch J-Y519723, confirming our deep connection to this ghost match. But the question of origin remained unanswered—until I remembered a technique shared by a colleague in a genealogy group.

The Backdoor: Tracing the Maternal Line

Y-DNA tracks the father, but every man also carries his mother’s mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). While I couldn't see YF089142's personal details, I could search for their sample ID to see where they appeared on the maternal tree.

A simple search revealed the hidden clue: YF089142 belongs to the mtDNA Haplogroup H1-h*.

When I examined the H1-h* tree, the "anonymous" fog began to lift, revealing a striking ethnic pattern that aligns perfectly with my family's oral history of "Tatar" and "Nakh" origins.

Triangulating the Ethnicity: Eastern Kavkaz, Kumyks, and the Steppe

There are 5 samples in the H1-h* maternal tree. While my match's info was hidden, three others carried explicit flags: Two Chechens and one Kumyk.

To understand the context of this maternal group (and by extension, the likely origin of my hidden Y-DNA match), I analyzed the Y-DNA lineages of these "maternal cousins." The results were a revelation of North Caucasian and Steppe history:

1. The Alan Connection (Sample YF002090) This individual carries the Y-DNA haplogroup Q-BZ84 (a subclade of Q-YP4000).

• Significance: This lineage is famously associated with the Alan and Scythian cultures of the Iron Age Central Asia. It connects directly to the ancient nomadic warriors who dominated the steppe.

2. The Kumyk Connection (Sample YF138067) This individual carries the Y-DNA haplogroup C-F6193.

• Significance: This is a quintessential Steppe lineage. Ancient connections link it to Mongols, Xiongnu, and Historical Siberia.

• Geography: The modern distribution of this lineage peaks in the Republic of Kalmykia (69%), followed by Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. This strongly supports the presence of a Golden Horde/Tatar genetic legacy within this maternal cluster.

3. The Broad Connection (Sample YF093499) Another sample in this group belongs to Y-DNA J-Y23522*.

• Significance: This lineage shows a vast distribution from Dagestan to Medieval Hungary and Viking Denmark, hinting at the extensive reach of these migration corridors.

Conclusion: The Circle Closes

The evidence is indirect but compelling. My closest paternal match (the ghost sample) belongs to a maternal cluster (H1-h*) that is densely populated by Chechens and Kumyks—peoples who carry the genetic legacy of the Alans, Scythians.

This validates my hypothesis: My paternal line, though indigenous to the Caucasus (J2), has been intertwined with the Steppe Warriors (Q and C lineages) and North Caucasian natives for millennia. The "Tatar" identity my grandfather spoke of was not a myth; it was a reflection of this precise sociopolitical ecosystem.

---

References & Ancient Connections

• YFull Tree: J-Y284818

  • The paternal branch where my sample and the "hidden match" (YF089142) converge, establishing a common ancestor approx. 3900 years ago.

• YFull Live Tree: J-Y519723

  • The terminal branch confirming the relationship between my sample and my father's FTDNA data.

• YFull MTree: H1-h*

  • The maternal haplogroup of my hidden Y-DNA match. This cluster contains samples identified as Nakh and Kumyk, providing the key ethnic context.

• Ancient Connections: Q-BZ84

  • FTDNA Discover report linking the Nakh sample in the H1-h group to Iron Age Central Asia, Alans, Scythians, and Cimmerians. Based on the study published in Nature (2018).*

• Nature Article: 137 Ancient Human Genomes from Across the Eurasian Steppes

  • The scientific study providing the context for the Steppe ancestry found in the Q-BZ84 samples.

• Ancient Connections: C-SK1066 (Parent of C-F6193)

  • FTDNA Discover report linking the Kumyk sample in the H1-h group to Mongols, Xiongnu, and Ancient Siberian populations, with a high modern frequency in Kalmykia.*

• Ancient Connections: J-Y23522

  • FTDNA Discover report for the other sample in the cluster, showing a diverse range of ancient connections from Assyrian to Viking eras.

The Steppe Paradox: Decoupling "Turkic" Identity from "Ancient Steppe" Genetics

In my quest to validate my family’s oral history—which persistently claims a "Tatar/Kipchak" (Steppe) origin—I encountered a confusing discrepancy in my father's autosomal DNA results.

Depending on which algorithmic calculator was used, the results seemed contradictory. One calculator claimed we had 0% connection to the Turkic migration, while another showed we were 35% Steppe.

This article analyzes the raw data from Eurogenes K13, MDLP K11, and PuntDNAL K13 to resolve this paradox. The conclusion reveals a critical distinction between "Genetic Turkicness" (Medieval migration) and "Ancient Steppe Ancestry" (The indigenous bedrock of the Eurasian plains).

---

1. The Negative Result: Eurogenes K13 and the "East Eurasian" Marker

The first analysis using the Eurogenes K13 calculator presented a stark challenge to the "Tatar" narrative.

• The Data:

  • West Asian: 45.29% (Dominant - Indigenous Caucasus/Highlands)

  • East Med: 31.66%

  • Siberian + East Asian: ~0.79%

• The Interpretation: Geneticists typically use "Siberian" or "East Asian" admixture as the primary marker for the Medieval Turkic expansions (Seljuk/Ottoman/Tatar waves). An average Anatolian Turk carries 5-15% of this marker.

• The Initial Verdict: With less than 1%, the data suggested we had no biological link to the migration of the Turkic peoples from Central Asia. We appeared to be purely indigenous Caucasians (Georgian/Laz/Armenian profile) who had been culturally assimilated.

---

2. The Hidden Truth: MDLP K11 and the "EHG" Component

However, when I ran the data through MDLP K11—a calculator designed to isolate deeper, ancient components—a completely different picture emerged.

• The Data:

  • EHG (European Hunter-Gatherer): 35.01%

• The Interpretation: EHG is the genetic signature of the Ancient Steppe. It is the ancestral component of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, Scythians, Sarmatians, and Alans who roamed the Pontic-Caspian steppe thousands of years before the conventional timeline of Turkic migrations (Though one must ask: Who can say with absolute certainty when the Turkic language truly arrived there, or if it wasn't already spoken by these ancient tribes?).

The Conflict: How can one have 0% Siberian (Turkic) DNA but 35% Steppe (EHG) DNA?

---

3. Resolving the Paradox: The "Wheat vs. Bread" Analogy

To understand this, we must distinguish between the ingredients of a population and the label of a population.

The mainstream scientific definition of "Medieval Turkic" genetics is a specific recipe:

Turkic = Ancient Steppe (ANE/EHG) + East Asian (Siberian)

• The "Bread" (Turkic Identity): Requires both the flour (Steppe) and the yeast (East Asian).

• My Family's DNA (The Wheat): We possess an enormous amount of the flour (35% EHG/Steppe), but we lack the yeast (0% Siberian).

The Conclusion: My father is not a "Medieval Turkic Migrant" in the Siberian sense. He is a descendant of the Proto-Steppe populations (Scythian/Alan/Sarmatian substratum) who inhabited the region north of the Caucasus long before the history books claim the Turkic language arrived. (And honestly, how can modern academia be so sure that these Proto-Steppe peoples weren't the original carriers of a Proto-Turkic tongue, independent of the Siberian wave?)

We are the indigenous warriors of the Steppe who were later culturally "Turkified" (Tatarized) by the Golden Horde—or perhaps, we were the original stock that the Tatars recognized as kin, despite the genetic drift.

---

4. The Synthesis: PuntDNAL K13 Global

The final analysis with PuntDNAL K13 confirms this synthesis of a "Northern" Caucasian profile.

• The Data:

  • West Asia: 45.15% (The Caucasian Base)

  • NE Europe: 8.31% (The Connection to the Russian Plains)

  • Siberian/NE Asia: ~2.79% (Trace amounts of later admixture)

This confirms that while our base is solidly Caucasian (West Asian), there is a significant Northern pull (NE Europe/EHG) that differentiates us from southern Anatolian populations.

Final Verdict

My family’s claim to be "Tatar" is not a biological lie; it is a historical identity. Biologically, we represent the Iron Age populations of the Caucasus and the Pontic Steppe—the people who were on the land when the Tatars arrived.

We carry the spirit of the Steppe, written in the ancient code of the EHG. Whether the language we spoke 2000 years ago was labeled "Scythian" or "Proto-Turkic" is a debate I leave to the linguists, but my DNA proves I am of the Steppe, regardless of the Siberian percentage.

The Mehtuli Hypothesis: Tracing 'Kara Mehdi' to 'Kara Ahmet'

In genealogical research, a single name can sometimes act as a lighthouse in the fog of history. For my family, that name is "Kara Ahmetler."

While my Y-DNA (J-F20274) confirms a deep, indigenous North Caucasian (Nakh/Dagestani) root, my grandfather's persistent oral testimony was: "We are Tatars/Crimeans." For years, this seemed like a contradiction. How could a Caucasian genetic line identify as Tatar?

The answer may lie in the history of the Kumyks—a Turkic-speaking Caucasian people—and specifically, the Mehtuli Khanate.

1. The "Kara" Dynasty: Kara Mehdi (The Black Mahdi)

Historical records from Dagestan mention a powerful figure emerging in the late 16th century: Kara Mehdi (appears in records ~1590-1614).

• The Title: He was the ruler of Dorgeli and expanded his territory from the Kumyk plains to the Avar mountains. He was known as a protector of smaller clans against larger khanates.

• The Connection: The recurrence of the epithet "Kara" (Black/Grand/Formidable) in my family ("Kara Ahmetler") is not a coincidence. It is a stylistic signature of this specific dynasty.

2. The Phonetic Evolution: From Mehdi to Ahmed

My hypothesis focuses on a linguistic drift over four centuries of oral tradition.

• The Original: Kara Mehdi (or Qara Mahdi).

• The Transition: In local dialects, "Mehdi" often softens to "Medi" or "Med."

• The Conflation: The dynasty also had prominent rulers named Ahmat Han (Ahmed Khan).

• The Result: It is highly plausible that the ancestral memory merged the founder (Kara Mehdi) with his prominent descendants (Ahmat Han), evolving into the family name "Kara Ahmetler" (The Black Ahmeds).

3. The "Tatar" and "Crimean" Link

The Mehtuli rulers carried a specific and prestigious title: "Crimean Shamkhal" (Kırım Şamhal).

• This title denoted their political and blood ties to the Crimean Khanate (The Tatars).

• The Resolution: My grandfather was right. We are not genetically Tatars from the Mongol steppe, but we are the descendants of a dynasty that carried the "Crimean" title and political identity. The DNA is Caucasian (Hardware), but the identity is Tatar (Software).

4. The "Ahıska" (Akhaltsikhe) Bridge: The Smoking Gun

The most striking piece of evidence comes from the 18th-century records regarding Ahmat Han II and Haci Ahmat Han.

• The Event: During conflicts with Persia (Nadir Shah) or internal feuds, these rulers allied with the Ottoman Empire.

• The Migration: Historical accounts (such as those by historian Jacob Reineggs) state that Ahmat Han migrated to the Ottoman lands with 200 men, but crucially, he left a significant portion of his family (approx. 200 people) in a new palace/settlement in Akhaltsikhe (Ahıska).

The Geography of Survival: Ahıska is the immediate geographic neighbor of Artvin/Şavşat (where my family has lived for generations). It is highly probable that during the subsequent Russian invasions (1829 or 1877-78), the descendants of this "noble family left in Ahıska" crossed the mountains into the safer, Ottoman-controlled valleys of Şavşat—bringing with them the name "Kara Ahmet" and the memory of being "Crimean/Tatar."

Source:

Mekhtuli Khanate

Mekhtuli Khanate

[Türkçe Versiyon]

Mehtuli Hipotezi: 'Kara Mehdi'den 'Kara Ahmet'e İz Sürmek

Soybilim araştırmalarında tek bir isim, bazen tarih sisinin içinde bir deniz feneri işlevi görebilir. Benim ailem için o isim **"Kara Ahmetler"**dir.

Y-DNA sonuçlarım (J-F20274) köklerimin derin, yerli bir Kuzey Kafkasya (Nakh/Dağıstan) hattına dayandığını doğrulasa da, dedemin ısrarlı sözlü beyanı şuydu: "Biz Tatarız / Kırımlıyız." Yıllarca bu durum bir çelişki gibi göründü. Kafkasyalı bir genetik hat, nasıl kendini Tatar olarak tanımlayabilirdi?

Cevap, Türk dilli bir Kafkas halkı olan Kumukların tarihinde ve özellikle Mehtuli Hanlığı'nda yatıyor olabilir.

1. "Kara" Hanedanı: Kara Mehdi

Dağıstan tarihi kayıtları, 16. yüzyılın sonlarında tarih sahnesine çıkan güçlü bir figürden bahseder: Kara Mehdi (1590-1614 arası kayıtlarda görülür).

• Unvan: Dörgeli yöneticisi olan Kara Mehdi, hakimiyetini Kumuk ovalarından Avar dağlarına kadar genişletmişti. Küçük klanları, büyük hanlıklara karşı himaye etmesiyle tanınırdı.

• Bağlantı: Ailemdeki "Kara" (Güçlü/Çetin/Siyah) lakabının ısrarla korunması ("Kara Ahmetler") bir tesadüf değildir. Bu, söz konusu hanedanın karakteristik bir imzasıdır.

2. Fonetik Evrim: Mehdi'den Ahmet'e

Hipotezim, dört asırlık sözlü gelenek içindeki dilbilimsel bir dönüşüme dayanıyor.

• Orijinal: Kara Mehdi (veya Qara Mahdi).

• Geçiş: Yerel ağızlarda "Mehdi" ismi zamanla "Medi" veya "Med" olarak yumuşatılabilir.

• Birleşme: Hanedanlığın soy ağacında Ahmat Han (Ahmet Han) isimli çok önemli yöneticiler de bulunmaktadır (Örn: Ahmat Han II, Hacı Ahmat Han).

• Sonuç: Atasal hafızanın, kurucu figürü (Kara Mehdi) ve güçlü torunları (Ahmat Han) birleştirerek, zamanla "Kara Ahmetler" (Kara Ahmed) ismine dönüştürmüş olması son derece güçlü bir olasılıktır.

3. "Tatar" ve "Kırım" Bağlantısı

Mehtuli yöneticileri çok spesifik ve prestijli bir unvan taşıyorlardı: "Kırım Şamhal" (Kırım Şavhal).

• Bu unvan, onların Kırım Hanlığı (Tatarlar) ile olan kan bağını veya siyasi ittifakını simgeliyordu.

• Çözüm: Dedem haklıydı. Biz genetik olarak Orta Asya'dan gelen Tatarlar değiliz; ancak "Kırım" unvanını ve siyasi kimliğini taşıyan bir hanedanın bakiyesiyiz. DNA Kafkasyalı (Donanım), ancak kimlik Tatar'dır (Yazılım).

4. "Ahıska" Köprüsü: Kayıp Halka

En çarpıcı kanıt, 18. yüzyılda yaşamış Ahmat Han II ve Hacı Ahmat Han ile ilgili kayıtlardan geliyor.

• Olay: İran (Nadir Şah) tehdidi veya iç çekişmeler sırasında bu yöneticiler Osmanlı ile ittifak kurdular.

• Göç: Tarihçi Jacob Reineggs gibi kaynaklar, Ahmat Han'ın Osmanlı topraklarına geçtiğini, ancak kritik bir şekilde, ailesinin yaklaşık 200 kişilik bir kısmını Ahıska'da (Akhaltsikhe) yeni bir saraya/yerleşime bıraktığını yazar.

Hayatta Kalma Coğrafyası: Ahıska, ailemin nesillerdir yaşadığı Artvin/Şavşat bölgesinin hemen sınır komşusudur. Büyük olasılıkla, Ahıska'ya bırakılan bu "soylu ailenin" torunları, sonraki Rus işgalleri (1829 veya 93 Harbi) sırasında sınırı geçerek, daha güvenli ve dağlık olan Şavşat'a (Mamanelisi/Yavuzköy) sığındılar. Yanlarında "Kara Ahmet" ismini ve "Kırımlı/Tatar" olma hafızasını getirdiler.



*********************************************************************************

https://akkopru-kumuk.tr.gg/Mehtuli-Hanl%26%23305%3B%26%23287%3B%26%23305%3B.htm

Some information regarding the Mehtuli Khanate is given in an article I came across randomly above. Here are some excerpts from the text:

2-KARA MEHTİ: Kara Mehti begins to appear in the historical arena in the first half of the 1590s. In 1598, he was the administrator of Dörgeli. In the early 17th century, he succeeded in expanding his borders and his own rule from the Kumyk-Avar borders to the mountainous regions of Dagestan, where the Dargin population was dense. In 1614, he participated in the arrival of princes in Targu under the name of the Mehtuli prince, and his name began to be mentioned in the letters of the Shamkhal and the Avar Nutsal. Eventually, Kara Mehti, taking all possibilities into account, calmly consolidated his authority among the mountain population and began to pose a danger to the Avar Dynasty. In the face of this situation, the Avar Khan Nutsal wrote a letter of request to Eldar Shamkhal Tarkovsky for him to be stopped. Kara Mehti's name was not forgotten within the dynasty of his own lineage until 1867. Kara Mehti was a person who also characterized future neighborly relations, so he took the mountain tribes under his protection and undertook the duty of protecting them against raids from other neighbors. According to the information, Kara Mehti was a person invited by some small neighboring beyliks for their own protection. These villages later urgently entered Kara Mehti's protection; their number was eleven villages.

AHMAT HAN II (SON OF UMA HAN): Ahmat Han, the valuable chief of the Mehtuli administration, is seen on the stage of history in 1741. It is stated in 19th-century Mehtuli documents that he had been in the administration since 1735. Especially according to information from the 18th century, his son Uma and his younger brother Ali-Sultan Cungutayli are among this information. As seen here, in chronological order, the eldest nephews from Kara Mehti Han's lineage held the administration in their hands. In the late 18th century, there are hesitations about whether Ali-Sultan and Haci-Ahmat Han were the children of Mehti Bek on one hand, and Ahmat Han and Uma Han on the other. What should not be forgotten in these periods is that the Khans were referred to not by their father's names but by names inherited from their Generation or lineage. This Ahmat Han is an important Khan in the history of Dagestan. He becomes famous for his resistance and superiority against Iranian attacks in the Andalal region pitched battle fought with Nadir Shah. After the Andalal war, Ahmat Han, upon invitation, passed to Kars and from there to Istanbul and was accepted by the Ottoman Sultan, Sultan Mahmud (1730-1754). He was given the title of Beylerbeyi and the rank of General. At that time, due to relations between Dagestan and the Ottoman Empire, there is strong evidence that some people from the Shamkhal lineage were educated in Ottoman palaces and went back to Dagestan. Also, Adil-Geray's son Hasbulat was raised in the Ottoman palace as a result of the Ottomans' decision. With the help of the Ottomans, he rose to the position of Crimean Shamkhal. His brother Saadat-Geray became the Shamkhal Assistant. At that time, one of Ahmat Han's close relatives stayed in the Ottoman Palace and took his place among the top administrators. According to historian Reyneggs, Ahmat Han migrated to the Ottoman Empire with 200 men and left the rest of his family in his new palace in Akhaltsikhe. They served in the Ottoman Army under the command of Süleyman Pasha.

HACİ AHMAT HAN SON OF MEHTİ: He appears on the stage of history with this name in 1796. Tihanov writes about him that Cungutayli Ali-Sultan and his brother Aci Ahmat Han gathered all powers in their hands and even gave death sentences to criminals. They were quite competent and harsh in establishing internal laws. In this period, Haci Ahmat Han lived in Upper Cungutay. His relations with his elder brother Ali-Sultan are based on public information written in 1867. According to the laws of the Khanate, the administration was supposed to pass to the elder brother Ali Sultan. But he separated 4 villages he had and gave them to his younger brother Haci Ahmat Han, and while doing this, he never had a thought of escaping from administration. Historian Yakob Reynegg claims that Ahmat Han was in a very bad situation during the separation period of the Kazi Kumukh Khanate. They had nothing other than 14 villages and the trade center Dörgeli. Misfortunes came one after another. He had no children from the marriages he made, and this became a subject of ridicule among his wives and friends. Selling everything he owned to Ali Sultan and also leaving his wives, he sent his family members of 200 people along with his advisors to Koska or Akhalitsedeki (New Palace). He himself served in the army under the command of Süleyman Pasha, who was an Ottoman Pasha. Haci Ahmat Han passed away in 1802/04.

EMERGENCE OF THE MEHTULİ KHANATE It was a feudal form of administration consisting of Kumyks and Avars, established under the leadership of a person named Mehti Ulu or Mehtulla, who was in the position of leader of people belonging to the Mehti family that emerged from within the Targu feudal structure, that is, in the 17th century, 200 years before the abolition of the Targu administrative unit, which was the Kumyk Dynasty in 1867. The family, choosing the village of Cüngutay as the capital, formed the administrative unit here from the 17th century onwards. According to documents, in the second half of the 16th century, a great migration occurred from the Shamkhal lineage to the future Mehtuli Khanate. In 1598, warriors of the Terek region inhabited Cüngutay. These warriors were Surhay Han's cavalrymen. Surhay Han was the nephew of Mehti, the Crimean Shamkhal of the neighboring village of Dörgeli. In Kaka şura, Prince Sultan, one of the Shamkhal's nephews, was the administrator. In Arkuşa, there were Kazi Özden shamkhals. According to documents from 1580, Crimean Shamkhal and Shamkhal Elim-Sultan were cousins. In Turkish Diplomatic documents, Prince of Buynak Mehmet Han is mentioned. In documents from 1598, Mehtulla was again the son of Crimean Shamkhal. Therefore, this person was given the name Kara Mehti or Magnificent Mehti. Kara Mehti appears in Russian-Kumyk diplomatic correspondence (1626-1631). Meanwhile, Eldar Shamkhal Tarkovsky had expressed to the Russian Tsar that Mehti Mirza was his own uncle and that he himself was from the children of the Mehti dynasty and from the özdens (nobles). In documents from 1659, it is stated that the Cüngutay administration of the Terek region warriors were the children of Crimean-Shamkhal Mehtis, and this Khanate here was called the Mehtuli Khanate. In the 17th century, the administration passed into the hands of Kara Mehti's son. This administrator was Han Murza, the son of Crimean-Shamkhal Mehti Ahmat Han.

https://akkopru-kumuk.tr.gg/Mehtuli-Hanl%26%23305%3B%26%23287%3B%26%23305%3B.htm

Yukarıda rastgele denk geldiğim bir makalede Mehtuli hanlığına ilişkin bazı bilgiler veriliyor.

Yazıdan bazı kesitler:

2-KARA MEHTİ:Kara Mehti 1590 yılının ilk yarısında tarih arenasında görünmeye başlıyor.1598 yılında o Dörgeli yöneticisiydi.17 yy. başlarında sınırlarını ve kendi yönetimini Kumuk-Avar sınırlarından Dargi nüfusunun yoğun olduğu Dağıstanın dağlık bölgelerini kapsayacak şekilde yaygınlaştırmayı başardı.1614 te Targuda prenslerin Mehtuli prens adı altındaki gelişlerine katıldı ve ayrıca Şamhalın ve Avarlı Nutsalın mektuplarında adı geçmeye başladı.Sonunda Kara mehti bütün olasılıkları göz önüne alarak dağlı nüfüs arasındaki otoritesini sakin bir şekilde sağlamlaştırarak Avar Hanedanlığı için tehlike oluşturmaya başladı.Bu durum karşısında Avar Hanı Nutsal Eldar Şavhal Tarkovskiye onun durdurulması için bir rica mektubu yazdı.Kara Mehti kendi soyunun hanedanlığı içinde 1867 ye kadar ismi unutulmadı. Kara Mehti gelecekteki komşuluk ilişkilerini de karakterize eden bir kişiydi bu yüzden dağlı kavimleri himayesine alarak onları diğer komşularından gelecek olan akınlara karşı koruma görevinide üstlenmişti.

Bilgilere göre Kara Mehti komşuları olan bazı küçük beylikler tarafından kendilerinin korunması için davet edilen bir kişiydi.Bu köyler sonradan acilen Kara Mehtinin himayesine girdiler bunların sayısı onbir köydü.

" AHMAT HAN II(UMA HAN OĞLU):Mehtuli yönetiminin değerli amiri Ahmat Han 1741 yılında tarih sahnesinde görülüyor.Onun 1735 ten itibaren yönetimde olduğu XIX yy daki Mehtuli dokumanlarında belirtiliyor.Özelliklede XVIII yy daki bilgilere göre oğlu Uma ve küçük kardeşi Ali-Sultan Cungutayli bu bilgiler arasında.Buarada görüldüğüne göre kronolojik sıraya göre Kara Mehti Hanın soyundan en büyük olan kardeş çocukları yönetimi ellerinde tutmuşlardır.XVIII yy .sonlarında Ali-Sultan ve Haci-Ahmat Hanın bir yandan Mehti Bek in ,Diğer yandan Ahmat Hanın ve Uma Hanın çocukları olduğu konusunda terreddütler var.Bu dönemlerde unutulmaması gereken şey Hanların Baba isimleriyle değil Nesil veya soydan kalma isimleriyle anılmalarıdır.Bu Ahmat Han Dağıstan tarihinde önemli olan bir Handır. Nadir Şahla yapılan Andalal bölgesi meydan muharebesinde İran saldırıları karşısındaki direnciyle ve üstünlüğüyle ün salıyor.Andalal savaşından sonra Ahmat Han davet üzerine Kars ve oradanda İstanbula geçerek Osmanlı sultanı Sultan Mahmut(1730-1754)tarafından kabul ediliyor.Ona Beyler beyi ünvanı ve Generallik rütbesi veriliyor.O zamanlar Dağıstan ile Osmanlı arasındaki ilişkiler sebebiyle Şamhal soyundan gelen bazı kişilerin Osmanlı saraylarında eğitilerek Dağıstana tekrar geri gittikleri konusunda güçlü deliller bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca Adil-Gerayın oğlu Hasbulatta Osmanlıların kararı sonucu Osmanlı sarayında yetişti. O Osmanlıların yardımıyla Kırım Şavhal Konumuna yükseldi Kardeşi Saadat -Geray ise Şamhal Yardımcısı oldu.O zamanlarda Ahmat Hanın yakın akrabalarından biri Osmanlı Sarayında kalarak üst yöneticiler arasında yerini aldı. Ahmat Han tarihçi Reyneggs göre 200 adamıyla Osmanlıya göç etti ve Ailesinden geride kalanları ise Akhaltsihedeki yeni sarayında bıraktı. Osmanlı Ordusunda Süleyman Paşanın emrinde görev aldılar.

HACİ AHMAT HAN MEHTİ OĞLU:Bu isimle 1796 yılında tarih sahnesinde görülüyor.Tihanov onun hakkında ,Cungutayli Ali-Sultan ve kardeşi Aci Ahmat Han bütün yetkileri ellerinde topladıkları hatta suçlulara ölüm cezası bile verdiklerini yazıyor.İçerdeki kanunların oluşturulması konusunda oldukçe yetkin ve sert tavırlar içindeydiler.Bu dönemde Haci Ahmat Han Yukarı Cungutayda yaşadı.

Onun büyük kardeşi Ali-Sultan ile ilişkileri 1867 deki yazılan halk bilgilerine dayanıyor.Hanlığın kanunlarına göre yönetim yaşlı kardeş ali sultana geçmesi gerekiyordu.Ama o kendisinde olan 4 köyü ayırarak küçük kardeşi Haci Ahmat Hana verdi bunu yaparkende hiç bir zaman yöneticilikten kaçmak gibi bir düşüncesi yoktu.Tarihçilerden Yakob Reynegg Ahmat Hanın Kazi Kumuk Hanlığının ayrılma döneminde çok kötü bir durum içinde olduğunu ileri sürüyor.14 köy ve tiaret merkezi olan Dörgeliden başka hiç bir şeyleri yoktu.Şanssızlıklar ardı ardınaydı.Yaptığı evliliklerden çocuğu olmamış bu da eşleri ve arkadaşları arasında alay konusu olmuştu. Bütün sahip olduğu her şeyi Ali sultana satarak ayrıca eşlerinide bırakarak 200 kişilik aile efradınıda danışmanlarıyla beraber Koska yada Akhalitsedeki(Yeni Saray) a gönderdi.Kendiside Osmanlı Paşası olan Süleyman paşanın emrindeki orduda görev aldı.

Haci Ahmat Han 1802/04 te vefat etti.

MEHTULİ HANLIĞININ ORTAYA ÇIKIŞI

1867 Kumuk Hanedanlığı olan Targu yönetim biriminin ortadan kaldırılmasından 200 yıl önce Targu feodal yapısı içinden yani XVII.yy. da çıkan Mehti ailesine mensup kişilerin lideri konumunda olan Mehti ulu yada Mehtulla isimli kişinin önderliğinde kurulan Kumuk ve Avarlardan oluşan bir feodal yönetim biçimiydi.Başkent olarak Cüngutay köyünü seçen aile burada XVII.yy. dan itibaren yönetim birimini oluşturdu.Dökumanlara göre XVI.yy. ikinci yarısında gelecekteki Mehtuli Hanlığına Şamhal neslinden büyük bir göç oluştu.1598 yılında Terek bölgesi savaşçıları Cüngateyi mesken tuttular.Bu savaşçılar Surhay Hanın atlı süvarileriydi.Surhay Han ,komşu Dörgeli köyünün Kırım Şamhalı olan Mehti nin yeğeniydi.Kaka şurada ise Şamhalın yeğenlerinden Prens Sultan yöneticiydi. Arkuşada ise Kazi Özden şamhalları bulunuyordu.1580 deki dökumanlara göre Kırım Şamhal ,Şavhal Elim-Sultan ile iki kardeş çocuklarıydı.Türk Diplomatik dökümanlarında ise Buynak Prensi Mehmet Handan söz ediliyor.1598 yılındaki dökümanlarda yine Mehtulla Krım Şavhalın oğluydu.Bu yüzden bu kişiye Kara Mehti veya Muhteşem Mehti adı verildi.

Kara Mehti Rus-Kumuk diplomatik yazışmalarda (1626-1631-) görülüyor .Bu arada Eldar Şavhal Tarkovski Mehti mirzanın kendi amcası olduğu kendisinin Mehti sülalesi çucuklarından ve özdenlerden olduğunu Rus Çarına ifade etmişti.1659 daki dökumanlarda Terek bölgesi savaşçılarının Cüngutay yönetimi Kırım-Şavhal Mehtilerin çocukları olduğu ifade ediliyor ve buradaki bu Hanlığa Mehtuli Hanlığı denilmiştir.XVII.yy.da yönetim Kara Mehtinin oğlunu eline geçti.Bu yönetici Kırım-Şavhal Mehti Ahmat Hanın oğlu Han Murza idi. "

Stories From Grandmothers

The Bandit, The Stone, and The Secret of Mamiya

The most compelling chapter in our family's oral history is the story of my paternal grandmother, Mahperi (mtDNA T2g1a), and her mysterious father, Memiya. Mahperi, known in the village by the nickname "Bulunmaz" (The Incomparable), was the longest-living witness to this history.

The Character and the Code

Mahperi’s own personality—authoritarian, knowledgeable, and emotionally possessive was largely shaped by a profound absence.

• Family Nickname: My grandmother’s lineage carried the nickname "Delikayalar" (Crazy Rocks/Boulders). This perception by the village of a harsh, unpredictable temperament is significant, suggesting a family history of resistance and individuality

• The Name Anomaly: Mahperi’s father’s name, Memiya stands out in our regional archives as unique, reinforcing the possibility of a non-local or deeply rooted ancestral line that avoided later assimilation.

2. The Conflicting Oral History

When asked about her father, Mahperi’s account was characterized by profound emotional conflict. As a child, I witnessed her switch between an unyielding silence and a sudden, heartbreaking outburst:

"How would I know? He died when I was still a baby. He was a bandit, he was trash! He would get on his horse, go up to the mountains, and sometimes wouldn't return for days, sometimes for months."

Mahperi’s conflicting emotions—the anger, the tears, and the harsh self-judgment—reveal the depth of the trauma and the social pressure surrounding his memory. Being labelled "trash" or a "bandit" clearly brought great shame to the family.

The Historical Context: Resistance and Identity

Mamiya was likely born around the 1890s, when the Artvin region was under Russian occupation (1877-1918). His actions—disappearing into the mountains, returning irregularly—fit the pattern of local resistance or militia activity against the occupying forces, rather than simple banditry.

• He chose the path of the outlaw to protect what he believed was right, forcing his family to endure the resulting social isolation and the lasting shame of the "bandit" label.

My conversation with my paternal grandmother (my father's mother) I think dates back to 1995 when they visited and stayed at our house again. But our conversations on this theme continued even after the 2000s. My paternal grandmother was the longest-living of all my grandparents.

She is a carrier of T2g1a mtDNA (maternal lineage).

I can say that she was quite arrogant, knowledgeable, and authoritarian. My mother, including all the other daughters-in-law, frankly did not like her much and was a little afraid of her. This is because she had a possessive nature over her sons. And she carried the pressure, common in the Eastern Black Sea region, that mothers-in-law put on their daughters-in-law: "you have to take care of us in our old age."

Perhaps it would be beneficial to talk about her family before my conversation with her.

Her family is actually not a very well-known family in Yavuzköy. I will now recount the reflection of my paternal grandmother's family, which I may have "misunderstood" slightly due to my father's joking nature. If there are readers from that lineage, they should know and not be angry that I am recounting the memories that were passed on to me, largely learned by forcing and insisting on asking.

My paternal grandmother's family was known by the nickname "Delikayalar" (Crazy Rocks/Boulders). The other families in the village were somewhat wary of them. Apparently, they had a harsh and unpredictable temperament, befitting their nickname. No one knows why they were called Delikayalar. This name could be related to a place name, a nickname given to an elder, or even an event.

What captures my interest and attention is this: My paternal grandmother, nicknamed "Bulunmaz" (Unfindable/Incomparable), was primarily named Mahperi. The name of my paternal grandmother's father, as recorded in state archives, is "Memiya." This name is the only "strange" name in our family archives; frankly, I haven't seen anyone else with that name in Artvin.

When I spoke with my paternal grandmother as a child, there would be moments like this: she would jokingly envy my belongings or a piece of clothing I owned and would try to elicit sympathy by saying, "We didn't have things like this when we were children." I would often ask, didn't you have a father, why didn't he buy them?

She would frown and wouldn't say anything.

One day, somehow, she decided to tell the details of the matter.

She said, "My father's name was Memiya."

I asked, "What kind of a name is that?"

She said, "I don't know."

I asked, "What kind of person was he?"

She said, "I don't know."

I asked, "Doesn't a person know what kind of person their father was?"

She said, "How would I know? He died when I was still a baby."

I asked, surprised, "How did he die?"

Her face crumpled with a mix of tears and anger.

She said, "He was a bandit, he was trash!" and started to cry.

I was surprised. "A bandit, how? What do you mean, Grandma?" I asked.

She said, "How should I know? He would get on his horse, go up to the mountains, and sometimes wouldn't return for days, sometimes for months. That's why they would call him a bandit, a mugger."

I couldn't understand it back then. But my paternal grandmother's father, "Memiya," must have been born around the 1895s. The region was under Russian occupation at that time. It is understood and recounted that there were groups who were resisting even under occupation in the region, and it seems that "Memiya," who was described as a "bandit," may have been some kind of folk hero.